9.00 am Bangkok time.
Thanks to Sensintrovert. It is confirmed that Altantuya’s son is not Abdul Razak Baginda’s. Bernama has the story out today. The report says that her son, four-year old, Altanshagai, is her ex-hubby’s. The source of the story is a mysterious “police source”.
Howsy blogged about the timing of the results, which co-incides with the Ijok by-election campaign period, which has reached a feverish level, with the Opposition haunting our DPM Najib Tun Razak with songs of Altantuya.
On Sunday Najib, said to be linked to the case due to the origin of the C4 explosives used to blow her up in pieces, just miles away from Ijok, denied the case was in anyway related to him.
But what strikes me is: how does the “police source” know that Altantuya’s son belongs to her ex-hubby and is not Baginda’s son? Where did he base his information on?
We all know that the experts who went to Mongolia last month (14 March) did not take any blood samples from the young boy, who is suffering from a rare disease.
They took the grand mother’s blood sample and this was confirmed by Mr. Stev Shariibuu, Altantuya’s father, himself.
Unless it is probable to tell a young boy’s DNA without so much as touching him? Any forensic expert on board, please help.
Or else, I am inclined to ask: who is lying again and for what? This time I really want some answers!